The team | View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Feb 20, 2018 3:29 pm

Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
 and I thought the Koppen system was bad! 
Author Message

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:01 pm
Posts: 334
Location: Maryland, USA
Post and I thought the Koppen system was bad!
I previous had a bit of a battle about climate classification; in my opinion, Trewartha's modification of Koppen system is a vast improvement. Living in a place like Sydney is quite different from living in Vancouver, BC. This doesn't happen in Sydney!
But I found an even more minimalistic system that will really make you say WTF. ... 2_2008.pdf

So, Banff, Alberta - 240 cm of snow per annum, avg. low in winter of -14C, is the "same climate" as never-had-a-frost Durban. Yeah. That makes sense! Everything about the natural world tells us that yearly thermal averages have very little to do with what grows or lives (in terms of animals) in an area. So, let's go make a climate classification system based on just that one factor!
And people in the SW UK will be pleased to know their climate is the same as southern Siberia. That must be why tree ferns grow so well in both places.

Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:33 am
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 12:14 am
Posts: 689
Location: Te Aroha, Waikato, North Island, New Zealand
Post Re: and I thought the Koppen system was bad!
Brilliant.I'm the same as Cairns north queensland australia. Nothing I can't grow then. :roll:


Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:35 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.